Review Policy

Our journal uses a stringent double-blind peer-review process to maintain the quality and integrity of the research we publish. Every submission is assessed by at least two independent experts in the field, who evaluate the manuscript on its originality, methodological rigor, significance, and clarity. Authors can anticipate a prompt and constructive review process.

The editorial team first assesses submitted manuscripts to determine their suitability for publication and compliance with the journal’s scope and guidelines.

Reviewers then evaluate the manuscript based on its scientific quality, clarity of presentation, and adherence to ethical standards. They offer constructive feedback and suggestions to help authors enhance their manuscript.

Authors are informed of the peer review outcome and receive comments and recommendations from reviewers. They are given the chance to address the reviewers' concerns and revise their manuscript accordingly.